EA-58361 · Multi-Timeframe

StellarLite_ICT_EA

This EA implements ICT (Inner Circle Trader) concepts — specifically the Silver Bullet and 2022 Model strategies — for the Stellar Lite 5K prop firm challenge. It uses higher timeframe MA bias, liquidity sweeps, market structure shifts, fair value gaps, and NDOG/NWOG detection to find entries, with partial take-profits at 1:1, 2:1, and 3:1 R:R and trailing stop management.

Open the interactive view (equity curve, symbol switch)

Key facts

RiskMedium
Blow-up riskLow
Rating★★★☆☆
TypeTrading EA
TimeframesM5, M15, M30, H1
IndicatorsSMA (200), ATR (14), Fibonacci OTE (0.618/0.786)
AuthorAdvanced ICT Trader

Backtest results (H1, about 1 year)

SymbolP&LAnnualMax DDTradesWin rateSharpeRecoveryLosing streakPer tradeStatus
EURUSD0.00%0.00%0.00%0—————Not convertible yet
GBPUSD0.00%0.00%0.00%0—————Not convertible yet
USDJPY0.00%0.00%0.00%0—————Not convertible yet
XAUUSD0.00%0.00%0.00%0—————Not convertible yet

Why this EA never traded: no entry rule survived the conversion.

Converted from MQL5 to Python and run with the same rules for every EA. Positions use MT5 lot sizes (100,000 units per FX lot, 100 oz per gold lot) with 1:100 leverage, one order at a time, and a stop-out below 10% of the starting balance. Sharpe is computed from the equity curve. Results marked as unreliable are shown for completeness only.

Blow-up risk: No blow-up pattern found

None of the usual blow-up patterns were found in the code, and the account was not stopped out in our backtests. That is not a guarantee: any EA can lose money.

High: stopped out in our backtest, or martingale/grid sizing without a stop loss. Elevated: martingale or grid sizing with a stop loss, or several positions at once without a stop loss. What the label means and what we found →

Strategy analysis

The strategy is based on ICT concepts, using a higher timeframe (H1) 200-period SMA to determine trend direction, only trading in alignment with the trend. Entry requires five simultaneous conditions: a liquidity sweep (price piercing a key liquidity level then reversing), market structure shift (MSS confirming trend reversal), a fair value gap (FVG providing the entry zone), NDOG/NWOG confirmation (the current candle's range is within an ATR-based threshold), and price retracing into the FVG zone. The Silver Bullet strategy only trades during the NY AM Killzone (10:00-11:00), while the 2022 Model trades any time but uses inverse liquidity sweeps (inducement) for additional confirmation. Exits use partial take-profits: 50% closed at TP1 with SL moved to breakeven, 25% closed at TP2 with a trailing stop activated, and the remaining 25% held to TP3. Position sizing is based on a fixed risk percentage (0.25%) with lot size automatically calculated from the stop-loss distance. Money management enforces a 10% total drawdown and 5% daily drawdown hard limit, complying with prop firm challenge rules.

Strengths

  • Strict money management: 0.25% risk per trade, 10% total drawdown and 5% daily drawdown limits fully compliant with prop firm challenge rules
  • Well-structured partial take-profit: closes 50% at TP1 locking profit and moving SL to breakeven, then 25% at TP2 activating trailing stop, balancing profit protection with trend following
  • Multi-condition entry filter: requires liquidity sweep + MSS + FVG + NDOG/NWOG five-fold confirmation, significantly reducing false signal entries
  • Higher timeframe trend filter: uses H1 200 SMA for directional bias, avoiding counter-trend trades

Weaknesses

  • ATR handle memory leak: CheckNDOG_NWOG creates and releases an iATR handle on every call, causing resource waste and potential performance issues with frequent invocations
  • Overly simplified liquidity detection: FindNearestLiquidityLevel only finds the highest/lowest point in the lookback period without identifying true structural swing highs/lows, easily producing false signals
  • Flawed MSS (Market Structure Shift) logic: only compares close/high/low of the last 3 bars without considering the magnitude or time span of structural breaks, prone to misjudgment
  • Inverted FVG detection logic: the buy FVG condition checks rates[i].high < rates[i-2].low, which describes a bearish gap rather than a bullish FVG, inconsistent with the actual ICT definition
  • Daily drawdown baseline uses equity instead of balance, inconsistent with most prop firm rules which typically use the day's opening balance
  • Single position limitation: positionInfo.SelectByMagic only checks for existence of a position with the magic number, unable to manage multiple simultaneous positions

Possible improvements

  • Move ATR handle initialization to OnInit() to avoid repeated creation/destruction in CheckNDOG_NWOG, improving performance and preventing resource leaks
  • Improve liquidity level detection: implement proper swing high/low identification (e.g., fractal or ZigZag-based methods) instead of simply finding extremums in the lookback period
  • Fix FVG detection logic: bullish FVG should be rates[i-2].high < rates[i].low (gap between bar i-2 high and bar i low unfilled by the middle bar), consistent with ICT definition
  • Enhance MSS detection: add magnitude thresholds for structural breaks (e.g., ATR multiple beyond previous structure point) and consider longer time-span structural shifts
  • Support multi-position management: use position iteration instead of single-position SelectByMagic, allowing the strategy to manage multiple trade signals simultaneously

Risk assessment

Overall risk: Medium

  • Inverted FVG detection logic may cause entries in the wrong direction, leading to unnecessary losses
  • Overly simplistic MSS detection may produce false structural break signals, increasing erroneous trade probability
  • Repeated ATR indicator handle creation in CheckNDOG_NWOG on every tick may cause resource exhaustion in high-frequency tick environments
  • Daily drawdown baseline uses equity instead of opening balance, which may violate actual prop firm evaluation rules
  • String comparison for time filtering (timeStr >= SB_StartTime) may fail across midnight boundaries

Evaluation scores

Code quality2.0
Strategy logic3.0
Risk management4.0
Robustness2.0
Innovation3.0
Documentation2.0
Overall2.7

Parameters

ParameterDefaultDescription
RiskPercentPerTrade0.25Risk percentage per trade
MaxTotalDrawdownPercent10.0Maximum total drawdown percentage
MaxDailyDrawdownPercent5.0Maximum daily drawdown percentage
InitialBalance5000.0Initial account balance
TP1_RR1.0TP1 risk-reward ratio
TP2_RR2.0TP2 risk-reward ratio
TP3_RR3.0TP3 risk-reward ratio
PartialClosePercentTP150.0Position close percentage at TP1
PartialClosePercentTP225.0Position close percentage at TP2
PartialClosePercentTP325.0Position close percentage at TP3
MoveSLToBE_AfterTP1trueMove stop loss to breakeven after TP1
BE_PlusPips1Additional pips for breakeven stop loss
TrailingSL_Pips10.0Trailing stop in points
Use_SilverBullettrueEnable Silver Bullet strategy
SB_StartTime10:00New York AM kill zone start time
SB_EndTime11:00New York AM kill zone end time
Use_2022ModeltrueEnable 2022 Model strategy
Use_OTE_EntrytrueUse Fibonacci OTE entry
HTFPERIOD_H1Higher timeframe period
HTF_MA_Period200Higher timeframe moving average period
HTF_MA_MethodMODE_SMAMA calculation method
DOL_Lookback_Bars120Liquidity lookback bar count
NDOG_NWOG_Threshold0.5NDOG/NWOG ATR multiplier threshold
OTE_Lower_Level0.618OTE Fibonacci lower level
OTE_Upper_Level0.786OTE Fibonacci upper level
ShowTradeLevelstrueDisplay trade level lines

Similar Multi-Timeframe EAs

Backtests are historical simulations and do not guarantee future results. Not financial advice.

Get the weekly Arena report

One email a week: ranking changes, new signals and new research. No spam; unsubscribe any time.