Famous strategies · 2026-11-10

Buffett 90/10 Portfolio: does it still work? Replicated through 2026

We re-ran it on S&P 500 from 2010-01-04 to 2026-11-10 (16.8 years, before costs): +12.5% a year, Sharpe 0.85, worst drawdown -30.5%. The benchmark, S&P 500 buy-and-hold, did +13.8% a year (Sharpe 0.85, worst drawdown -33.7%).

Verdict: About the same risk-adjusted return as its benchmark. Historical, hypothetical results before costs, taxes and fees. Not investment advice.

Adapted Adapted: this is not the real thing

This is our adapted version, not the real portfolio or fund. Read what is lost before comparing it with anything published about the original.

What is lost

  • The 10% short-term government bond sleeve is cash earning 0% instead of a short-term yield.
Bond sleeve held as cash

10% of the original allocation is government bonds. We have no bond data, so that 10% is held as cash earning 0%.

What this means: no coupon income, no price gains when yields fall or stocks crash, and none of the losses bonds had when yields rose (2022). Read the results as the non-bond part plus idle cash. The real portfolio would have done differently, better in some years and worse in others.

Where it comes from

Attributed toWarren Buffett

Buffett's own stated recommendation for ordinary investors' retirement money.

Rules, weights and thresholds are given as commonly cited. We have not re-checked them against the primary text.

The original rules

Instructions for his wife's trust: 10% in short-term government bonds and 90% in a very low-cost S&P 500 index fund.

How we replicate it

What we changed

Short-term government bonds are replaced by cash; SPY stands in for the S&P 500 index fund.

The exact rule we run

Buy 90% SPY and keep 10% in cash (0%). Rebalance at the last close of each year.

Target weights: 90.0% S&P 500, 10.0% Cash (0%).

Conventions: Position decided at a close earns the next day's return; no look-ahead; before costs; cash earns 0%; starts 2010-01-04, when all its assets have data; weights drift between rebalances (annually); rebalanced at the last close of the period.

Growth of 1 vs the benchmark

0.841.582.955.5210.320112013201520172019202120232025
Replica S&P 500 buy-and-hold · start = 1, log scale; before costs

Benchmark: S&P 500 buy-and-hold, same period. Bought on the first day and held.

Drawdown from the previous peak

-34%-25%-16%-7%2%20112013201520172019202120232025
Replica S&P 500 buy-and-hold · how far below its own high at each date

Key numbers

CAGR+12.5%Benchmark: +13.8%
Sharpe ratio0.85Benchmark: 0.85
Max drawdown-30.5%Benchmark: -33.7%
Volatility15.3%Benchmark: 17.0%
Worst calendar year-16.4%Benchmark: -18.2%
Best calendar year+29.1%Benchmark: +32.3%
Time in market90%Benchmark: 100%
Drawdown from peak today-3.4%Benchmark: -3.7%

Sample: 2010-01-04 to 2026-11-10, 16.8 years, 4240 daily observations. Annualised from the number of observations per year of the strategy's own calendar. Before costs.

Recent and full-period returns

PeriodReplicaBenchmark
Last month-3.4%-3.7%
Last year+10.1%+11.2%
Last 5 years+65.1%+72.9%
Whole period (cumulative)+630.9%+788.9%

Calendar-year returns

YearReplicaBenchmarkReplica minus benchmark
2026*+9.7%+10.8%-1.1%
2025+15.9%+17.7%-1.8%
2024+22.4%+24.9%-2.5%
2023+23.6%+26.2%-2.6%
2022-16.4%-18.2%+1.8%
2021+25.9%+28.7%-2.9%
2020+16.5%+18.3%-1.8%
2019+28.1%+31.2%-3.1%
2018-4.1%-4.6%+0.5%
2017+19.5%+21.7%-2.2%
2016+10.8%+12.0%-1.2%
2015+1.1%+1.2%-0.1%
2014+12.1%+13.5%-1.3%
2013+29.1%+32.3%-3.2%
2012+14.4%+16.0%-1.6%
2011+1.7%+1.9%-0.2%
2010+11.8%+13.1%-1.3%

* Partial year. The first year starts on the first day of the replica; the current year is year to date.

Position as of 2026-11-10

HoldingWeight
S&P 500 SPY90.9%
Cash (0%)9.1%

Weights today, after drifting since the last rebalance on 2025-12-31. Target weights are in the rule above. Drawdown from its peak today: -3.4%.

What it did in 2020 and 2022

EpisodeDatesReplicaBenchmark
COVID crash2020-02-19 → 2020-03-23-30.5%-33.7%
2022 bear market2022-01-03 → 2022-10-12-22.1%-24.5%

Close to close between the two dates. Two episodes only: not enough to judge a strategy.

How much to trust it

  • A fixed allocation has no signals, so it is one path of history (16.8 years), not a test.
  • This is one backtest on one path of history, before costs and with hindsight on the choice of strategy. It does not show the strategy will work in future.

Honest caveat

Very close to the original; the 10% sleeve earns 0% instead of short-term bond yield.

Related

Other famous strategies

Markets used: S&P 500

All famous strategies

Historical, hypothetical results before costs, taxes and fees. Not investment advice.

Get the weekly Arena report

One email a week: ranking changes, new signals and new research. No spam; unsubscribe any time.