Famous strategies · 2026-11-10

Turn-of-the-Month Effect: does it still work? Replicated through 2026

We re-ran it on S&P 500 from 2010-01-04 to 2026-11-10 (16.8 years, before costs): +3.3% a year, Sharpe 0.49, worst drawdown -13.8%. The benchmark, S&P 500 buy-and-hold, did +13.8% a year (Sharpe 0.85, worst drawdown -33.7%).

Verdict: Worse risk-adjusted return than its benchmark over this period. Historical, hypothetical results before costs, taxes and fees. Not investment advice.

Rule as published Rule as published

This replica applies the published rule as written, on the instrument we have. It is still a backtest on ETF data, before costs.

What is lost

  • The exact window follows our reading of the paper and may differ by a day.
  • SPY instead of the Dow Jones index over 90 years.

Where it comes from

Attributed toJosef Lakonishok & Edwin Smidt
SourceAre Seasonal Anomalies Real? A Ninety-Year Perspective, Review of Financial Studies (1988)

A founding academic paper on calendar anomalies, now a standard reference in seasonality research.

Rules, weights and thresholds are given as commonly cited. We have not re-checked them against the primary text.

The original rules

Using 90 years of Dow data, nearly all price gains came in the four trading days around the turn of the month, from the last trading day to the third trading day of the new month.

How we replicate it

What we changed

SPY only. We hold the window from the close before the last trading day through the third trading day of the next month, so the last day's return is captured; cash otherwise.

The exact rule we run

Buy 100% SPY at the close of the second-to-last trading day of each month; sell to cash at the close of the 3rd trading day of the next month. Otherwise hold cash.

Conventions: Position decided at a close earns the next day's return; no look-ahead; before costs; cash earns 0%; starts 2010-01-04, the first day a signal exists; every market has an equal slot of equity; indicators use each market's own trading days.

Growth of 1 vs the benchmark

0.841.582.955.5210.320112013201520172019202120232025
Replica S&P 500 buy-and-hold · start = 1, log scale; before costs

Benchmark: S&P 500 buy-and-hold, same period. Bought on the first day and held.

Drawdown from the previous peak

-34%-25%-16%-7%2%20112013201520172019202120232025
Replica S&P 500 buy-and-hold · how far below its own high at each date

Key numbers

CAGR+3.3%Benchmark: +13.8%
Sharpe ratio0.49Benchmark: 0.85
Max drawdown-13.8%Benchmark: -33.7%
Volatility7.3%Benchmark: 17.0%
Worst calendar year-4.7%Benchmark: -18.2%
Best calendar year+16.2%Benchmark: +32.3%
Time in market19%Benchmark: 100%
Drawdown from peak today-0.3%Benchmark: -3.7%

Sample: 2010-01-04 to 2026-11-10, 16.8 years, 4240 daily observations. Annualised from the number of observations per year of the strategy's own calendar. Before costs.

Recent and full-period returns

PeriodReplicaBenchmark
Last month-0.3%-3.7%
Last year+12.8%+11.2%
Last 5 years+10.5%+72.9%
Whole period (cumulative)+73.6%+788.9%

Calendar-year returns

YearReplicaBenchmarkReplica minus benchmark
2026*+12.9%+10.8%+2.1%
2025+1.3%+17.7%-16.4%
2024-4.7%+24.9%-29.6%
2023+6.7%+26.2%-19.5%
2022-2.4%-18.2%+15.7%
2021+1.9%+28.7%-26.8%
2020+16.2%+18.3%-2.1%
2019+3.1%+31.2%-28.1%
2018-1.6%-4.6%+3.0%
2017+4.7%+21.7%-17.0%
2016-1.1%+12.0%-13.1%
2015-2.0%+1.2%-3.3%
2014-1.3%+13.5%-14.8%
2013+4.3%+32.3%-28.0%
2012+8.7%+16.0%-7.3%
2011-1.6%+1.9%-3.5%
2010+13.8%+13.1%+0.7%

* Partial year. The first year starts on the first day of the replica; the current year is year to date.

Position as of 2026-11-10

HoldingWeight
Cash (0%)100.0%

Currently entirely in cash. Last change of position: 2026-11-04. Drawdown from its peak today: -0.3%.

What it did in 2020 and 2022

EpisodeDatesReplicaBenchmark
COVID crash2020-02-19 → 2020-03-23+5.2%-33.7%
2022 bear market2022-01-03 → 2022-10-12+0.9%-24.5%

Close to close between the two dates. Two episodes only: not enough to judge a strategy.

How much to trust it

  • 405 position changes over 16.8 years.
  • This is one backtest on one path of history, before costs and with hindsight on the choice of strategy. It does not show the strategy will work in future.

Honest caveat

The window boundaries follow our reading of the paper, so the exact days may differ by a day.

Related

Other famous strategies

Closest strategies on Quant Arena

Similar idea, tested on the site's own rule set; not the same rule.

Markets used: S&P 500

All famous strategies

Historical, hypothetical results before costs, taxes and fees. Not investment advice.

Get the weekly Arena report

One email a week: ranking changes, new signals and new research. No spam; unsubscribe any time.