Claim checker · Portfolio and investing habits

Claim check: Correlations go to one in a crisis

“In a crisis all correlations go to 1, so diversification fails when you need it.”

What the data says

Partly Partly: the average pairwise correlation among the ten markets was 0.25 while SPY was more than 10% below its peak, against 0.16 otherwise, a rise of +0.09 (-0.01 in the first half, +0.13 in the second). The link is real but weaker than the saying implies.

It holds in some markets or periods, leans the right way without proof, or helps on risk but not on return.

Who says it

Common refrain after 2008, 2020.

Origins are as commonly cited and were not independently verified.

How we tested it

For every pair of the ten markets we compute the correlation of daily returns on common dates, separately for days when SPY is more than 10% below its previous peak (stress, known at the previous close) and for all other days, then average over pairs. A rise of at least 0.15 in both halves of the history counts as correlations rising meaningfully in stress.

MarketsS&P 500, Gold, Silver, Oil, Natural gas, Commodities, Agriculture, EUR/USD, Bitcoin, Ether
Period2010-01-01 to 2026-11-10
Sample— observations
CostsBefore costs

Results

PeriodStress daysStressCalmDifference
Full history6970.250.16+0.09
First half1650.170.17-0.01
Second half5320.270.14+0.13
-0.020.060.130.210.29Full history stressFirst half stressSecond half stressFull history calmFirst half calmSecond half calm

Average pairwise correlation: stress vs calm

Stability across the two halves of history

A saying that only works in one half of the history is not much of a rule. Each row shows the effect in the full history, the first half and the second half; green means the claimed effect was present.

MarketFull historyFirst halfSecond half
All markets+0.09-0.01+0.13

Context and cross-checks

Shown for context; not part of the verdict.

The site's own strategies

StrategyMarketSharpe, 5 yearsBenchmark, 5 yearsSharpe, fullBenchmark, fullCAGR, fullBenchmark, fullMax DD, fullBenchmark, fullReading
PORT-05 Hierarchical Risk ParityHRP0.951.110.140.47+0.5%+5.3%-81%-38%No effect
-0.36-0.27-0.17-0.070.03PORT-05 HRP

Sharpe ratio minus benchmark, full history · Benchmark = the buy-and-hold shown on the strategy pages.

The honest caveat

Crisis windows overlap, so the number of independent crises is only a few.

Descriptive statistics from historical data, before costs. Not a forecast and not investment advice.

Questions

In a crisis all correlations go to 1, so diversification fails when you need it.

Partly: the average pairwise correlation among the ten markets was 0.25 while SPY was more than 10% below its peak, against 0.16 otherwise, a rise of +0.09 (-0.01 in the first half, +0.13 in the second). The link is real but weaker than the saying implies.

How was this claim tested?

For every pair of the ten markets we compute the correlation of daily returns on common dates, separately for days when SPY is more than 10% below its previous peak (stress, known at the previous close) and for all other days, then average over pairs. A rise of at least 0.15 in both halves of the history counts as correlations rising meaningfully in stress.

Related strategies on Quant Arena

Markets used

S&P 500 · Gold · Silver · Oil · Natural gas · Commodities · Agriculture · EUR/USD · Bitcoin · Ether

Related claims

All claims

Get the weekly Arena report

One email a week: ranking changes, new signals and new research. No spam; unsubscribe any time.