Claim checker · Moving averages

Claim check: The 200-day moving average rule

“Only be invested when price is above the 200-day moving average.”

What the data says

Partly Partly: the rule gave a maximum drawdown at least a quarter smaller together with a higher Sharpe ratio in 5 of 10 markets over 2010-10-07 to 2026-11-10 and in both halves of the history in 3; the median CAGR was +4.3% against +3.3% for buy-and-hold and the median maximum drawdown -51.2% against -71.2% (before costs). It holds in some markets, not across the board.

It holds in some markets or periods, leans the right way without proof, or helps on risk but not on return.

Who says it

Mebane Faber's 2007 'A Quantitative Approach to Tactical Asset Allocation' and Paul Tudor Jones's '200-day MA' remark made it a mainstream rule.

Origins are as commonly cited and were not independently verified.

How we tested it

Long from the day after the close is above its 200-day simple average, cash from the day after it closes below. Compared with buy-and-hold over the same dates. The rule counts as working only if it cuts the maximum drawdown by at least a quarter and also improves the Sharpe ratio, in the full history and in both halves.

MarketsS&P 500, Gold, Silver, Oil, Natural gas, Commodities, Agriculture, EUR/USD, Bitcoin, Ether
Period2010-10-07 to 2026-11-10
Sample10 of 10 markets usable
CostsBefore costs

Results

MarketPeriodCAGRBuy and holdSharpeBuy and holdMax drawdownBuy and holdIn marketTradesReading
S&P 5002010-10-18 → 2026-11-10+10.5%+14.2%0.910.87-20%-34%85%40Full history only
Gold2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10+5.4%+6.5%0.460.46-34%-46%61%69No effect
Silver2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10+5.1%+4.2%0.330.29-61%-76%49%68No effect
Oil2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10-1.5%-4.4%0.050.06-69%-95%51%93No effect
Natural gas2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10-7.2%-23.1%-0.11-0.29-72%-99%25%60Clear and stable
Commodities2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10+3.5%+2.3%0.330.22-41%-66%54%72Full history only
Agriculture2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10+3.0%+0.4%0.350.10-31%-62%47%52Clear and stable
EUR/USD2010-10-07 → 2026-11-10+0.2%-1.3%0.07-0.12-15%-35%48%60Clear and stable
Bitcoin2015-04-04 → 2026-11-10+59.0%+63.0%0.960.90-70%-83%61%38No effect
Ether2018-05-27 → 2026-11-10+40.0%+16.3%0.730.50-71%-86%51%23No effect
0.851.562.865.249.6220112013201520172019202120232025
Rule Buy and hold · log scale, before costs
-0.040.040.120.200.28SPYGLDSLVUSOUNGDBCDBAEUR/USDBTCETH

Sharpe ratio minus buy-and-hold

Robustness: other settings

SettingVerdict on its ownMarkets with a stable winMarkets where it won
Main settingPartly3 / 105 / 10
With a 1% bandDoes not hold1 / 103 / 10

Stability across the two halves of history

A saying that only works in one half of the history is not much of a rule. Each row shows the effect in the full history, the first half and the second half; green means the claimed effect was present.

MarketFull historyFirst halfSecond half
S&P 500-20% vs -34% · +0.04
2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10
-17% vs -19% · -0.03
2010-10-18 → 2018-10-25
-20% vs -34% · +0.08
2018-10-25 → 2026-11-10
Gold-34% vs -46% · 0.00
2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10
-34% vs -46% · +0.03
2010-10-18 → 2018-10-25
-29% vs -28% · -0.10
2018-10-25 → 2026-11-10
Silver-61% vs -76% · +0.03
2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10
-57% vs -72% · +0.09
2010-10-18 → 2018-10-25
-45% vs -58% · -0.06
2018-10-25 → 2026-11-10
Oil-69% vs -95% · -0.02
2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10
-62% vs -82% · -0.08
2010-10-18 → 2018-10-25
-59% vs -85% · -0.03
2018-10-25 → 2026-11-10
Natural gas-72% vs -99% · +0.18
2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10
-45% vs -90% · +0.26
2010-10-18 → 2018-10-25
-69% vs -94% · +0.12
2018-10-25 → 2026-11-10
Commodities-41% vs -66% · +0.11
2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10
-30% vs -63% · +0.31
2010-10-18 → 2018-10-25
-41% vs -38% · -0.07
2018-10-25 → 2026-11-10
Agriculture-31% vs -62% · +0.26
2010-10-18 → 2026-11-10
-25% vs -52% · +0.35
2010-10-18 → 2018-10-25
-14% vs -24% · +0.09
2018-10-25 → 2026-11-10
EUR/USD-15% vs -35% · +0.18
2010-10-07 → 2026-11-10
-15% vs -30% · +0.20
2010-10-07 → 2018-10-23
-11% vs -22% · +0.17
2018-10-23 → 2026-11-10
Bitcoin-70% vs -83% · +0.06
2015-04-04 → 2026-11-10
-70% vs -83% · +0.05
2015-04-04 → 2021-01-21
-64% vs -77% · +0.02
2021-01-21 → 2026-11-10
Ether-71% vs -86% · +0.23
2018-05-27 → 2026-11-10
-71% vs -86% · +0.28
2018-05-27 → 2022-08-19
-41% vs -68% · +0.17
2022-08-19 → 2026-11-10

Context and cross-checks

Shown for context; not part of the verdict.

The site's own strategies

StrategyMarketSharpe, 5 yearsBenchmark, 5 yearsSharpe, fullBenchmark, fullCAGR, fullBenchmark, fullMax DD, fullBenchmark, fullReading
MOM-05 Faber TAAFABER-TAA0.911.110.620.47+4.6%+5.3%-17%-38%Full history only
-0.010.030.070.120.16MOM-05 FABER-T

Sharpe ratio minus benchmark, full history · Benchmark = the buy-and-hold shown on the strategy pages.

The honest caveat

Test is on one price path per market; the rule's edge is mostly drawdown avoidance, which depends on a few crash episodes.

Descriptive statistics from historical data, before costs. Not a forecast and not investment advice.

Questions

Only be invested when price is above the 200-day moving average.

Partly: the rule gave a maximum drawdown at least a quarter smaller together with a higher Sharpe ratio in 5 of 10 markets over 2010-10-07 to 2026-11-10 and in both halves of the history in 3; the median CAGR was +4.3% against +3.3% for buy-and-hold and the median maximum drawdown -51.2% against -71.2% (before costs). It holds in some markets, not across the board.

How was this claim tested?

Long from the day after the close is above its 200-day simple average, cash from the day after it closes below. Compared with buy-and-hold over the same dates. The rule counts as working only if it cuts the maximum drawdown by at least a quarter and also improves the Sharpe ratio, in the full history and in both halves.

Related strategies on Quant Arena

Markets used

S&P 500 · Gold · Silver · Oil · Natural gas · Commodities · Agriculture · EUR/USD · Bitcoin · Ether

Related claims

All claims

Get the weekly Arena report

One email a week: ranking changes, new signals and new research. No spam; unsubscribe any time.